Church history rocks the party

A new day, a new topic - grab a cuppa, let's talk...

I don’t know about you, but the phrase “church history” used to conjur up images of eternal boredom. My neighbour recently shared the anecdote of how his younger brother, having just received a Christmas present from his grandmother, leafed through a “full-colour” hardback picture book of “gothic church architecture” with feigned gasps of interest – “oh thanks, Gran, that’s really great.”

Church history seemed like an endless lists of dates and councils and creeds, on a par with dreary pictures of empty buildings. Why check out church history, when you can get on with doing church now?

Over the last year I had the task of revising for church history exams, so the first rather less than pious answer to my question was: check out church history, or you’ll flunk bible college. However, in the process of learning about popes, princes and debates about transubstantiation, my eyes have been opened to the hordes of treasure waiting to be discovered in the more unexplored corners of the library. So here are some reasons why church history should most certainly begin to rock your party, if it hasn’t already been providing a rich soundtrack for many years of your life:

1. Church history is about lived-out faith

Spirituality is a word bandied about all over the place, be it in the church or your local yoga group. When I use the word I guess I mean “relationship and contemplative life with and under God”. The New Testament is not in the first instance a guide to spirituality. In Acts there’s a quick news bulletin: “the apostles met and broke bread”; “they sung a hymn”; “they devoted themselves to prayer and the word” - you get an idea of what sort of things went on, but you don’t get much insight into what this really looked like – there’s no MP3 recording.

I assume that the reason for this is that “spirituality” in the NT is Old Testament spirituality. The few prayers in the Gospels and Acts (Maria, Zechariah, Acts 4) are saturated in the Old Testament. The “word” that demanded devoted study was the Old Testament word – the Psalms, proverbs and other wisdom literature. “New Testament spirituality” is surely interpreted through the lens of the gospel of Jesus Christ, but it remains a “Psalms, Job, Ecclesiastes” spirituality.

I find myself wanting to listen to what it means to interpret this OT spirituality through the lens of Christ. You get awesome statements from Paul, like: “I live no longer, rather Christ lives in me.” But I find myself saying – wow, great, awesome, but Paul, tell me more – what does this look like? Tell me about how you live that out!

Church history is great because it’s about people following Jesus and working out what it means to live under God in Christ. Once you get past the dates and names (which is helpful to get a grip of the scenery), the way is clear to dip into the books behind the names and soak up all the wisdom and years of experience they recorded for our benefit. You get a sense of what it could mean to continue to grow and become mature in Christ.

2. Church history means you’re surrounded by witnesses

One of the things that has struck me is that even when in every age there are Christians who get the wrong end of the stick and are unbalanced in some area of their theology (of course, we here at the coffee bible club are all perfectly “balanced” theologians, all the time…), in amidst all the fuzz, in every age, God’s Spirit is at work. There’s a sort of unspoken assumption in evangelical circles that all theologians before the reformation were apostate, apart from Augustine - he’s ok because Calvin was a fan. That is certainly unfair to some, but judging by the quotations I hear in evangelical sermons, God’s Spirit only taught truth worth hearing to Luther, Calvin, Owen, Edwards, Packer and Stott. Or if you live in Germany like me then it was only Zinzendorf, Luther, Luther, Luther, Luther and Bonhoeffer.

I’ve been discovering through my church history classes that Luther stood in a long line of theologians who had worthwhile things to say about the sinfulness and weakness of man, the wisdom, glory and grace of God, and the need for reform in the church. “All over the world, God’s Spirit is moving” was a song we used to sing in the church of my childhood. “In all generations,” I might add.

This amazing work of God in all ages in the universal church has been a great comfort to me recently. In all generations there have been believers who - saturated in the culture of their day, challenged by temptations, surrounded with philosophical challenges to their faith - have “fought the good fight” of faith and worked hard at giving an account of their faith in Christ to the world around them.

Many mourn the move towards individualism in our Christianity. I’ve noticed that I am very reluctant to learn from others “since they are only human”. Part of this may be good Christology, but another regretfully large part of it is self-sufficiency on my part. Reading about people like Augustine has shown me how “me and my generation” are not the first to have the tricky double-task of translating the gospel into the philosophical air of the age and defending the faith from the attacks of the age. Every generation of Christians has faced this challenge. And that is encouraging.

So many of the questions that these old guys were dealing with are the same questions we encounter today. It’s mostly just the same, rehashed and repackaged. We can learn from the arguments and struggles of others throughout history and it equips us for the battles we face.

I’m currently listening to….

William Placher (Editor): “Callings. Twenty Centuries of Christian Wisdom on Vocation” is an anthology of writers on the topic of vocation, but it serves as an all-round selection of “tasters” from some of the most famous figures. Augustine’s Confessions is an autobiography with a theological end-part. It’s written in the form of a prayer to God. Henry Chadwick’s theological biography, Augustine, is quite philosophical/hard reading but remains inspiring. I followed Alister McGrath’s tip in his book about doubt to check out Thomas à Kempis’ The Imitation of Christ – there is a lot of challenging wisdom – it is questioning my motives a lot. The IVP Biographical Dictionary of Evangelicals is full of great short articles and shows how people from the evangelical tradition dealt with the challenges of the day – and it helps me understand more of where I come from.

Anyone else had any good cups of coffee with dead people alive in Christ that we should know about?

14 comments:

Scott said...

I quite like a suggestion I heard from Piper once, that every Christian teacher should 'befriend' a great theologian/preacher from church history and learn from them throughout their life.

Problem is.. just too many to choose from!

adrian reynolds said...

Yes, Yes, and yes again! I'm just writing some bible study material on church history for our own church (see here, where I've started blogging about it). I love what Schaff (another German!) says about it all: “The history of the church has practical value for every Christian, as a storehouse of warning and encouragement, of consolation and counsel. ... Next to the holy scriptures, which are themselves a history and depository of divine revelation, there is no stronger proof of the continual presence of Christ with his people.”

Gary said...

I hope I'm not out of order in posting a comment here - I've been reading for a while.

I fully agree - church history has so much to teach us; and we are not the first generation to encounter problems - we have the witness of the saints in all ages to help us, as they were empowered and led by the Spirit.

A couple of lessons from Church History that recently refreshed me were the biographies of Charles Simeon and Robert Murray M'Cheyne - two faithful gospel preachers in Cambridge and Dundee, mightily used by God, especially M'Cheyne who died when he was 29.

Gareth said...

I've just finished reading Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography by Iain Murray. Cracking stuff. I blogged a short review here.

étrangère said...

Absolutely. Trueman posts very helpfully about this fairly often on the Ref21 blog. I had some delightful and thought-provoking coffees with Athanasius fairly recently, his 'On the Incarnation'. And Edwards - brilliant (but you don't want to count him!) - borrowed a colleague's Works to prep for a Relay day and ended up buying my own 2-vols it's so good. I got A New Eusebius recently too, most interesting. The only problem is too much good stuff to read and too little time to read it. But then, if there were more time to read, there'd be too much to fully digest and put into practice...

thebluefish said...

Church history rocks.

Sam said...

@scott: know what you mean!
@gary: every contribution is warmly received
@rosemary: Jonny-boy does count too.. I have to confess to have only ever read Piper getting excited about Edwards .. I get the impression you read more than I breathe! ;)

James Mendelsohn said...

" So here are some reasons why church history should most certainly begin to rock your party"...

Hmmm. As a Messianic Jew I have to say I find church history pretty painful much of the time - yes, Luther rocks in many ways, but he also issued diatribes against the Jewish people which Hitler repeated verbatim, laying part of the ideological seedbed for the Holocaust. Others, too, such as John Chrysostom, were noted for their anti-Jewish invective. So yes, we can learn much from the greats of the past but we also need to read church history because, as Santayana said, those who fail to learn from history are destined to repeat its mistakes.

étrangère said...

James, in saying church history rocks I don't think any of us are suggesting that the history of the church is consistantly good! Merely that to study church history is immensely informative, fills in our generational / cultural blind spots and (thus?) alerts us to dangers. The saints and churches who've lived before us had all sorts of faults and failings, in life and doctrine; but so do we and we can learn from them, as you say, and see the faithfulness of God and the power of the gospel despite or in the most awful situations or sin.

James Mendelsohn said...

Hi Etrangere,

Good point well made - and indeed some of the names mentioned in this thread (McCheyne, Simeon, Edwards, and I think Murray) had very positive attitudes towards the Jewish people which I wish more modern evangelicals would learn from :-)

Phil Irish said...

Hi there ---- I've dropped in on a good discussion!

I just finished reading "Streams of Living Water: Celebrating the Great Traditions of the Christian Faith." It was a very inspiring read, pointing to many moments and people in Church History that I would like to know more about.

It is not a chronological book, concerned with dates and councils.... rather, it is mining the past, thematically, for nourishment today. Each "Stream" --- such as "contemplative," or " justice," or "charismatic" --- is fleshed out through the lives of three characters: a historical example, a biblical paradigm, and a relatively contemporary person.

Another thing that is stunning about the book is how it draws wisdom from such diverse folk, and Jesus is seen clearly in each example. It's a beautiful answer to Jesus prayer that we may be one.

Peace.
Phil Irish.

Phil Irish said...

Oh, I forgot to mention: the author is Richard Foster.

Andy said...

i'm just reading "Shining Like Stars" by Lindsay Brown: hot on the heels of the IFES world assembly this is a book of "contemporary history" - it is challenging, refreshing and quite exciting too. Comfort, rebuke, encouragement and a call to clarity in vision, mission and values shout from every page as lives are lived (and lost) for the sake of the gospel around the world.

Richard Harty said...

I, too, find church history to be rather painful. Both Luther and Calvin practiced some pretty high levels of violence and torture. In light of this I find their musing on theology to be rather empty.

And Augustine's obsession with his own lust is hardly a spiritual model to consider when reading his confessions. His use of bribery and violence to "convince" people of his "rightness" is also problematic.

Without compassion, intelligence is simply a tinkling cymbal if I recall. In a modern sense all of these men would be considered evil in today's world along the lines of Stalin and Hitler who were both very intelligent, but we don't consider their words to be something to be followed. In fact Hitler used Martin Luther's ideas to specifically justify religiously the attacks on the Jews. Because we don't know this history I believe we underestimate Luther's influence on the holocaust.

So, since I don't want to see the types of cultures these men supported come back, I don't believe its wise to consider their ideas as admirable.