In several of the comments, I've heard zionistic undertones. The story of the Christian hanging an Israel flag outside his window made me very queasy. Now rather than wading into the politics of this issue (e.g. is killing innocent civilians in Lebanon going to bring long-term peace etc.), I want to address a very important theological point. And as you can see, my conclusion is going to rub some people up the wrong way. However, I'm going to try and show how my position comes from the Scriptures in a very clear way.
1. Israels election and the promise of the Land
Surely, we might argue, the bible talks emphatically about Israel's election as God's special people. Among so many promises, one of the foundational promises to Abraham is that he would become a great nation. Again and again, God promises his people: I'm going to give you a Land, and it's going to be big and beautiful; you'll have peace, everything you need - trust me!
The specific promise of the Land in Josh 1,3-4 is breathtaking in its scope:
"Every place that the sole of your foot will tread upon I have given to you, just as I promised to Moses. From the wolderness and this Lebanon as far as the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites to the Great Sea towards the going down of the sun shall be your territory."
According to God, not only Lebanon belongs to his people, but also (at least parts of) modern Syria, Jordan and Iraq! Surely God honours his promises - God does not lie!
These arguments are clear and powerful.
But my post says: why Christians are not "pro-Israel". Stood against these clear promises of God in the bible, perhaps this sounds like a weird liberal idea, as if you could bet your bottom dollar that this "false teaching" comes from a bunch of theologians who aren't all that keen on clear biblical teaching.
But here's my main point: a pro-Israel stance denies the ministry of Jesus.
2. Israel's transformed worldview
In the first centrury A.D., in Israel, the Jewish worldview was transformed over a remarkably short period of time. It is difficult to express just how fundamental and shocking this change was. Judaism at that time was under pressure. Every few years a charismatic figure would lead a small revolt against the Romans. God had graciously called them back from exile, and the temple had been rebuilt, yet there was a sense in which the Jews felt that they were still in exile. They had still experienced horrific persecutions after the exile (e.g. under Antioches IV Epiphanes ca. 164 B.C.), and the Romans were really in charge - Herod was just a puppet-King - Israel is not "at peace".
Godly Jews recognised that it was important to protect the identity of the people - and in a sense, because they felt under pressure, they were encouraged to be more faithful, and their identity became more clear.
Into this situation of hope for God's freeing of Israel - and the sense that Jews should do something about it, and that keeping the faith and keeping the identity were important, spoke Jesus. The New Testament is filled with the language and symbols of 1st century Judaism. Yet - and this is very key - the language and symbols were used in a totally different way. The worldview of 1st century Jews, when they put their faith in Jesus, was transformed:
2.1 Temple
The temple was the focal point of Jewish religious and national identity. The temple was "God's house", the place where God dwelt. God's "Shekinah" glory/presence was in the holy of holies. Here was the place of atonement for sin, where sacrifices could be brought, as God's gracious means of sustaining the covenant with people who are not sin-free. The temple symbolised: God is with us.
But Christians filled the language of the temple with new meaning: Jesus said that worship would no longer be in the temple, but "in spirit and truth" (Jn 4:21); the fellowship of believers are the temple of the living God (2 Cor 6:16; 1 Cor 6:19). Jew and Gentile Christians have been joined together (Eph 2:14) to become a holy temple where God's Spirit lives (Eph 2:21-22). God is with us, in us by his Spirit.
2.2 Torah
The Torah (law) was central to Jewish religious life. Although there were differences of opinion about the exact interpretations, that a Jew should faithfully keep Torah was universally agreed. After all, the man who keeps Torah is like a tree planted by streams of water (Ps 1:3).
Jesus spoke into this situation with wonderful clarity. He says that we should keep Torah (Mt 5:17-20), but that it's not about ceremonial washings and fussy rule-keeping which in fact is often a cover-up for hypocrisy (Mk 7:1-23). Rather, keeping Torah is about wanting to please God from the heart (Sermon on the Mount - Mt 5-7!), and Torah is actually about loving God and your neighbour (Mt 22:36-40; Ja 2:8). Christians have now been set free from the Torah of sin and death (which only provokes to sin), so that we, with God's Spirit in us, keep the Torah of liberty (Ja 1:25; 2:12) - a fulfillment of God's promise of the new covenant in Jeremiah 31, where his law is written on our hearts, and his Spirit enables its keeping.
2.3 Land
The Land was the place which God had promised his people to live. Combined with the promise of a large geographical land, was the promise of peace and prosperity in the land, which of course included freedom from enemy oppression. Many Jews believed that the way to realise this freedom was not to "let go and let God" (a rather presumptious faith), but that they were to act as God's agents of change (in the knowledge that the battle belongs to the Lord). The kingdom of God would come - the new era where God would rule Israel, and there would be peace and prosperity under his King.
Jesus came with a message which subverted this national hope. The kingdom of God would not be big and brassy, but rather like a mustard seed which grows quietly (Mt 13:31f). It would come through the death of the King, rather than his might, an example which should be followed by those who belong to his kingdom (1 Peter 2:21f).
Rather than commanding his (jewish) disciples to renew the nation and free it from the oppression of the Romans, he commands them to make disciples of all nations. The "go and take the land" has become "go and take the world!"
The hope of the Christians is not for a restored Israel, but for a heavenly dwelling (2 Cor 5:2). The author of Hebrews makes this transformed understanding of the Land explicit: the promised land is what Joshua knew and hoped for; we now hope for "his rest" (Heb 3:18-4:1)
2.4 Religious identity
Briefly, the Temple, Torah and Land all define Jewish identity, and more specifically, important markers of this in practice were circumcision as a sign of belonging to the covenant people, and animal sacrifice as a way of atonement.
The new covenant people required neither circumcision or sacrifice. Baptism became a marker of belonging to the people, and the sacrifice motif was applied in two very clear ways: Jesus the High Priest has sacrificed himself for us, once for all (Heb 10:10). And we, offer ourselves (strictly metaphorically) as living sacrifices in his service (Rom 12:1f)
To summarise:
Jerusalem temple >> we are his temple
Torah >> we are dead to Torah and keep the royal Torah, from our hearts
take the Land - hope for the Land >> evangelise the world - wait for his rest
circumcision >> baptism
many sacrifices >> Jesus' sacrifice
3. Christians are not pro-Israel
There may be some Jews who still have not believed in Jesus, and who want to promote their nation. But this is not a tenable position for Christians. To say that Israel has a right to the land and that we should support a military solution is to live as though the New Testament was not written; yes: to live as though Jesus did not come.
4. Christians are not anti-Israel
It's important at this point to say that Christians are not anti-Israel. It doesn't mean I am pro-Lebanon, pro-Hisbollah or even pro-British or US. Although we are to honour our God-given leaders (Rom 13), our citizenship is in heaven (Phil 3:20). We should not cheer when bombs fall on Haifa, or when they fall on Beirut. Cheering for bombs has satanic origins.
5. A short word concerning the political situation
It seems to me that the current bombardment of civilians in Lebanon is an atrocity which will only lead to the swelling of Hizbollah's ranks and popularity. Christians should pray for the peace of Jerusalem, Haifa, Beirut, Baghdad, London, New York etc etc without prejudice. We should also (peacefully) do all we (politically) can. Israel should disarm and repent and believe the Messaiah, Jesus. Hizbollah should disarm and repent and believe the Messiah, Jesus. This conflict makes me sad and angry. Christians are certainly not pro-Hizbollah, but they are certainly not pro-Israel. If I see a Christian with an Israel flag, I think I'll be sick, right there, on the street. It's sub-Christian, it denies the gospel, and it glorifies war.
why christians are not "pro-Israel"
Posted by Sam at 8:52 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Dear Sam,
In the middle there, you said some really nice things that I understood, and you said some other things I am sure I would find value in contemplating in more depth.
But as a brother in the Lord, I have to say your headline and the last two sentences don't seem to be written with kindness in mind. More than that, they seem aimed at setting Christians against Israel at a time when we should be rallying around them in love.
I think you should read Romans 11 each day for a week, and really meditate on it each time. Then conform your actions to it, and see if your anger doesn't subside.
Peace in Christ
Sorry for not being more careful Sam. I should have said last 3 sentences.
AEM - mate, if we address one another like this, we have to do it in a named and accountable manner. I don't agree with everything in Sam's post but in the context of the CBCB we can say stuff that others disagree with (as you would over a cup of coffee) and you can even get agitated, angry and confrontational - but you can't do it anonymously. So, from here and henceforth I will be changing the rules of engagement. I'm switching anonymous comments off. Please do log in (sign up for a name - you don't need to blog to have a blogger name) and continue the conversation in the spirit of the CBCB. Thanks. Andy
Sam
The issue you seem to be addressing is about the political reality of the State of Israel, the relation of ethnic Israel to religious Israel (OT & NT) and how Christians are to respond.
I think I would agree with you most strongly where you talk about Christians not being pro-any 1 nation or national group. We are a people set apart - a holy nation, a royal priesthood: in fact, we are a cross-ethnic non-political multi-national grouping of refugees in this world. This is not our home: no nation, no land, no people, no identity claims higher allegience than Heaven for the Christian. We stand apart from and without the categories of the world, whilst living as a part of the world in which we live; 'In' but not 'of'.
Whilst I agree with you on identity, and whilst I don't share the details of the perspective I'm about to outline I do think it is a valid one, and one which I think brings a nuance to what you argued for; and leaves you open to the accusation of being unfair.
You said, "a pro-Israel stance denies the ministry of Jesus" - I disagree. It is more than possible to be a Christian and to support the state of Israel in it's efforts to attain a secure border and to attack it's enemies (given within a strong framework of international law and Biblical morality). This is as possible as someone voting for a right or left wing approach to political rule depending on their moral and politcial choices and convictions in any society. Being pro-Israel does not deny the ministry of Jesus, just as being pro-American, pro-British or pro_Iranian - national pride has it's place in Biblical Christianity.
However the nuance (and this is what I suspect you meant) is that thinking that being pro-Israel is predicated on faith in Jesus, as though it were some badge of loyalty or authentic belonging IS a denial of Jesus' ministry. It is all the more so a denial if it is taught that somehow the State of Israel is commensurate with the OT people of God and so in a Covenant with God that gives them moral Carte Blanche (which is never taught in OT). Jesus 'put away' the Old in order to bring in the New - the latter supercedes the former in fulfilling it and making it obsolete. Those who try and stand under the old are without hope for it cannot be held or fulfilled in part or in whole (the Temple, for one, is missing) and do so in denial and refusal of the New.
I don't think you are arguing that Christians should be anti-Israel, AEM has it wrong there - and AEM in omission has failed to see that as Christians we are to gather around the nations in love and truth: declaring the saving power of Christ in the face of a dying world - we do so to those in Lebanon and in Israel; both need to hear the call to hope, repentace and newness of life in Jesusq
This is helpful stuff! Sorry if my comment about the Christian with the Israel flag made you queasy. Imagine how it made me feel seeing it in person (and more difficult, trying to deal with the pastoral consequences, of which there are many). I think the points about the land are especially good - the land is quite a theme running through and starting in Eden. I think Christians need to develop this part of Biblical Theology a little. O Palmer Robertson engages with this quite extensively in "The Israel of God" (P&R) which comes to some good conclusions.
PS I am going to post his conclusions on my blog because I think they are worth rpeating.
Thank-you for the feedback.
aem, I am sorry if I gave you the impression that Christians should be against Israel. I value you pointing me to Romans 11. I should have included 11:18 in section 4: "why Christians are not anti-Israel". Christians should love Israelis, and pray that their land is peaceful. I am opposed to the applauding of the current Israeli government's policies on the basis of the old testament.
Andy, I would fully agree with: "[it's] possible to be a Christian and to support the state of Israel in it's efforts to attain a secure border and to attack it's enemies (given within a strong framework of international law and Biblical morality)". That's a helpful point which I should have made. It's a sentence I can agree with, because you can replace "Israel" with "Lebanon" or any other country.
I really only wanted to attack the religious pro-Israel stance, as you suspected.
I didn't manage to stay clear of political opinions. There may be Christians who think that it's right Israel bombs Lebanon to get rid of Hizbollah. They are not denying Jesus, rather expressing a political opinion.
However, I have a very different political opinion. I support the disarming of Hizbollah, but also the pacifying of Hizbollah. In my political naivity (maybe) I would love to see Israelis going to the Hizbollah strongholds and talking with the normal civilians, helping them improve their medical care, being merciful and walking in the light of the LORD. And when the bewildered civilians ask why the Israelis love their Lebanese neighbours, their answer would be: because Yeshua Messiah loved us and gave himself for us.
Hi Sam, Andy etc.
Well I've found it quite interesting to follow some of the discussion here - it certainly has widened my views - thanks for the opportunity to observe. I just have a quick comment and question.
Firstly - Sam - I too agree that the ultimate solution to any conflict is not military - ultimately, lasting peace will only be achieved through the sacrificial love that Jesus makes it possible to show. I'm sure even the Israeli generals realise that every bomb they drop, every Lebanese Dad they kill, will be the motive for the next generation of Hizbollah. But let's not forget is is not our (I presume you're not in Israel) homes getting rocketed. Military solutions are only short-term and nasty, but sometimes in this fallen world of ours they are necessary. Again, without necessarily endorsing current Israeli tactics, I do think when rockets are slamming into your cities, the time for aid-work may have been, the time for tanks, bombers and infantry-men might have come. Yes, the Israeli's should be waging war is a "loving" manner, avoiding civilian casualities, showing kindness and help to those caught in the middle - but I can't imagine a feasible Israeli reaction to this conflict that, in the short-term, doesn't involve guns. I look forward to the day when I can be a pacifist - and I firmly believe there will be a day like that - but it is not yet.
Which brings me to my question. My younger brother is currently training in the military. I'm very thankful about this. He has already had much opportunity to shine as a light, in a place known for it's abuse of alcohol, pornography etc - and much opportunity to tell the awesome story of Christ. It's a great place to train. But, as they reminded him the first day, you are being trained as a soldier first, a mechanic second. What does it mean to be a Christian soldier? How does one deal with the complicated issues of war - particularly as a lower-ranking soldier won't have all the details of the conflict they may be asked to serve in? NZ may be pretty quiet militarily at the moment - but it will not necessarily always be this way - like all soldiers he trains for war. Anyway, the upshot is that I reckon (and he agrees) that it would be good to think through some of the unique issues a Christian in his situation might encounter, in advance. But, he's not a great scholar - most books I found on Christians and war, are long and quite abstract. Can anyone here recommend practical, short(er), books/resources aimed at someone in his situation that might be helpful to work through? Email me i@me.net.nz or (if the owner's of this blog don't mind) post a comment here. (errr - sorry coffee drinkers - this is a bit off topic - but I thought I might find some knowledgable advice here - hope this is okay).
Sorry this comment is so long.
Jonny
Hi Jonny,
What you say makes sense - opposing Hizbollah with the military may be necessary. However, what I gather from the newspapers is that the offensive is brutal and undifferentiated (e.g. the bombing of the UN bunker) - although my comment was more muddled than I would have liked, what I want to say is that if the Israelis had been acting mercifully consistently over the last years then the situation might look different now. Like you, I am not a pacifist. I do go with the application of Romans 13 to international politics, and note that John the Baptist told soldiers to repent, but not to stop being soldiers.
However, I have never read a book about the topic. My only tip would be the relevant (short, readable) parts in John Stott's "Issues Facing Christians Today". He talks about possible Christian positions on war, atomic weapons etc.
Jonny, I've searched the SASRA and AFCU (CU groups for British Armed forces) websites and found this booklet - brief but has some pointers to books at the end. Take a look. The AFCU resources page has a few other military related articles. Is there no similar organisation in NZ?
Thanks sam and étrangère. I will look in to both of those things. That booklet looks like a good starting point.
I think there is an equivalent to AFCU in NZ but I'm not sure how functional it is (we have a much smaller military than the UK!) - but of course things start when people start them - so maybe I'll give my bro a nudge. Thanks heaps for the pointers.
Post a Comment