7 comments

Were the OT saints Unitarians or Trinitarians?


What do you think?

Take Isaiah 63:9-10 (actually you can keep reading on in that chapter for more about the Spirit and the Father):

In all their distress he too was distressed, and the angel of his presence saved them. In his love and mercy he redeemed them; he lifted them up and carried them all the days of old.

Yet they rebelled and grieved his Holy Spirit. So he turned and became their enemy and he himself fought against them.

Lots of us would be happy with an approach that says that for the doctrine of the Trinity to be established it would need to be shown from Scripture that:

1. There is only one God

2. There are three persons in the Godhead

3. Each person is fully God

And not that every text bears the load of proving all three propositions at the same time.

One or two caveats to add to this.

If, as it is sometimes suggested, the Trinity could not have been known and understood before the incarnation because of the rampant idolatry of the times how do webest account for the fact that an unschooled people (the Med was full of idolatrous Gentiles) converted to Trinitarianism lock, stock and barrel without much of a fuss?

If we are tempted to suggest that the OT saints could not have understood this truth how do we know this? Is that warranted by the texts (explicitly or implicitly) or is it an attempt to psychologize about the OT saints?

Is the anti-trinitarianism of the Judaism of the first and 21st centuries best accounted for not by a lack of biblical warrant but on other grounds (2 Cor. 3 and John 5, and John 10, come to mind)?

Does it really matter? We are all clear that Christian faith is Trinitarian. Does it matter if, for a time, pre-Christian faith was actually unitarian?

Do engage with the issues with an open Bible, a charitable spirit, and a desire to honour the Triune God.

Any opportunistic comments from anti-trinitarians, they always appear when I post something about the Trinity, will be deleted. If we want to read anti-trinitarian literature we can find it ourselves. You have been warned.

10 comments

The Sabbath

So, another question to the table. It is about the sabbath and what the sabbath really is.

I was reading in Hebrews the other day about the Sabbath, about entering into Gods rest - Hebrews 4. It appears to be a lot about entering into Gods Grace and resting from our works - because Christ has done everything.

But what does the sabbath mean for us after the Cross? Some Christians won't spend money on a sabbath, won't go out or do anything that isn't church or "christian". It is good to rest and to have days off but is that what a sabbath means - to not spend money or go out or spend time with non christian friends? Or is this a Godly attitude to have for the sabbath?

This is a really open question, but one I have been thinking about a lot and wondered what you thought. Whats the biblical response to the Sabbath for those that are in Christ?


205 comments

Whatever happened to the angel of the Lord?

I know that some of you will be thinking "whatever happened to this blog?" But, putting that question aside, I would like to raise some questions about the identity of the angel of the Lord, and the neglect of emphasis on his role in the OT.

He is present in the Pentateuch; known to the patriachs, and the protector and deliverer of the Israelites from their captivity in Egypt. He is distinguished from the LORD, and yet identified with the LORD.

He speaks to Hagar (Genesis 16:6-13), to Abraham (Genesis 22:2, 11-12), wrestles with Jacob (Genesis 32:30), identifies himself to Jacob as the "God of Bethel" (Genesis 31:11-13), redeems Jacob (Genesis 48:15-16), speaks to Moses (Exodus 3:1-6), testifies to Israel that he brought them out of Egypt and into Canaan (Judges 2:1-4, which God said that he had done in Joshua 24:2-8). The angel of the Lord identifies himself as God, speaks as God, and does the works of God.

And yet the angel of the Lord is also sent by God:

"But now go, lead the people to the place about which I have spoken to you; behold, my angel shall go before you." (Exodus 32:34)

"Behold, I send an angel before you to guard you on the way and to bring you to the place that I have prepared. Pay careful attention to him and obey his voice; do not rebel against him, for he will not pardon your transgression, for my name is in him." (Exodus 23:20-21)

Doug Kelly has an interesting appendix on this in his Systematic Theology (vol. 1). He writes:

Most Old Testament scholars for the last century (even conservative ones) have been considerably...restrained in definitely identifying all appearances of the angel of the Lord as the pre-incarnate Christ.
He makes the point that this was not so among the church fathers, medieval scholastics, and sixteenth-century Reformers. I have to say that when I trace out the influences upon my own understanding of the Old Testament they have been muted on this point, and more insistent on the lack of conscious faith in Jesus as the mediator in the OT.

Why has this happened?

Is it as a result of the books we read? Are our Bible overviews, which have helped so much in stressing the importance of the OT, not been detailed enough? We've seen the big picture but missed some important details perhaps?

Does this really matter?

Rightly interpreting Scripture always matters. The person and work of Christ always, always matters.

How do these passages mesh with your understanding of Christ in the OT? And your doctrine of God?

Let's make this an on-topic-stick-to-the-text type of discussion.

4 comments

Election

A theological, biographical, doxological nearly-rhyming poem for brokenhearted Calvinists.


My heart burned for you
You fed my faltering flame
Dry wood and tinder
I leapt for joy at the sound of your voice.
“Deepest love, wide as the ocean”
That filled my heart
With praise and adoration
You my God, my heart’s desire
The world the stage
Your task my part

Learning, growing, compromising
Wiser, stronger, weaker, falling
Your truth inspired a revolution
Hard facts drove out soft allusions
The word of God is true and sure
My heart sin-sick without a cure
“Work out your calling and election”
Seemed to mock my heart’s defection
Is there any hope for those
Whose hearts despise the God who chose?

Still, ahead, the man from Nazareth
Calling all the weary soldiers
Propping up the injured saints
Listens to the same complaints

God the perfect, God omniscient
Damns the world in his “great patience”
This sounds like a terrible movie
18+, pure horror, gory.
Is this what I’m supposed to think -
That all my friends will burn and sink?
“Praise be to God the innocent
Who might just rescue two percent
Of people who believe like “us”
If that sounds strange, then simply trust.”

Of course the preachers were much milder
But the cartoon-God was louder
Stuck inside theology
The system showing signs of strain
Stuck inside my sinful body
Causing Holy Spirit pain

Running hard in the wrong direction
The living God saw my intention
He let me walk away from home
He let me fail and end in squalor
“I curse you God!” I think I uttered
Ashamed now after resolution
I must recount my dissipation
It really was the purest sin
It should have sealed my bitter end

But in the midst of my rebellion
The living God arranged a banquet
Seeing I would not come home
He clothed himself with sin and dirt
And finding me in my own vomit
Pitying self and quite despondent
He stood me up and washed me down
Gave me bread and spoke quite softly:

I am the shepherd you desire
I loved you long before your fire
I loved you in your mother’s womb
You’ve never been a moment hidden
My Spirit searches deepest caverns
You are mine, you are forgiven

Dumbfounded, moved to tears, repentant
The arm of God worked my salvation
God the crucified, the broken
Saves the world and seeks the lost

Not the purest logic puzzle
Not philosophy’s perfection
But a living God took action
Saved me from my own abstractions

Sovereign God with great affections
Far beyond our speculations
You are Lord of all the nations
All will come before your throne
Confrontation, praise and glory
You reveal our secret stories
You will do the righteous thing
All will love you, truest King!

I want to tell my tale, be open
For those who still remain heartbroken
For those who still prefer a system
I fear it might do others harm
And even if the Lord’s right arm
Is strong enough to save the wounded
We shouldn’t snuff out smouldering wicks
But lead them to the blazing centre
Jesus Christ, the God who bought us.

1 comments

Right of the child in school assemblies

Conducting school assemblies means I sometimes have to take the rough with the smooth. For example, one school gives me three half hour slots at Easter to do the crucifixion, the resurrection and the ascension. Great!

But the same junior school also gives me (this week) the topic of the UN Rights of the Child. Aaagh! How do you go about that?

This is my thinking. Help (very) welcome:

I'm going to go back to the character of God. Where do we get our ideas about goodness, kindness, justice, lack of discrimination from? Ultimately we get them from God. They are not universal. Nor are they particularly logical. So, I will use the assembly to talk about God's character (possibly using Exodus 34:6 or maybe Isaiah 58:6).

I've got to be careful, of course, of mixing up common grace with saving grace and I'm not sure how to do this at the moment - other than to end up with the ultimate sign of compassion and love and justice - i.e. the cross.

8 comments

Getting ready for marriage


2009 will give me the privilege of marrying couples in our church (being a little rural non-conformist this is not something that occurs very often). What a joy and delight! Mrs R and I are just thinking through resources we might use for marriage preparation. Having been given none ourselves, and growing together into an ever more-exalted view of marriage, we are very keen to give these engaged couples a good start. We have already set ourselves some principles for prep:

  • even if we have more than one couple getting married near to each other, we are going to deal with each couple individually. Marriage is so important, we do not want couples to be intimidated, especially by some of the frank discussion necessary. If marriages are to be long lasting and successful we must invest the time beforehand in each couple.
  • we are going to be firmly Scriptural. Duh! Yet, many marriage prep resources seem to miss out some key ideas and concepts
  • we are going to take the classes together
There are plenty of good books around on marriage - some of the ones we have greatly enjoyed reading together and which provide good source material are:

To be honest, we were hoping to find a good course we could plug into, adapt and creatively use to deliver the teaching. But we have struggled
  • There is the ubiquitous marriage course from HTB. It's got some good practical stuff in it, but reading the accompanying book makes us think that it is short on linking this with Scripture and especially on starting with the Atonement as the model for marriage and all that implies
  • The Good Book Company produce a short course (4 weeks) but this is aimed at both believers and non believers with a strong evangelistic emphasis (it is good for that). We felt, however, that it is not deep enough for believers getting married.
So,
  • are there are other resources you can recommend: courses, material etc?
  • or, as we are beginning to think, do we invest the time to write our own?

1 comments

A Reformation Day Challenge

This is a duplicate post from my own blog. I'm trying to ease my guilt for having been invited to join this blog and so far having failed to write a single post...

Let me encourage you to make a resolution this Reformation Day. Take up the challenge to read three key books on the doctrine of justification by faith alone.


Before I say a little about each book let me underscore a few reasons why we ought to know the truth of justification as well as we can. Feel free to chip in with some recommendations of good books that you have read.

1. We cannot afford to lose this truth. And truth can be lost sight of, and that not merely for a generation but even for centuries. When justification by faith alone is lost sight of not only are we left in darkness but we will grope around to find in ourselves and our works the ground of our acceptance with God. In a day when this truth is being questioned, attacked, denied, and revised thank God that he has raised up men who are able to teach it clearly from the Scriptures, able to refute opponents, and for publishers who are making new and old volumes on this truth available.

2. We cannot afford to live without this truth. We dare not approach God without the obedience and blood of Christ, and we cannot benefit from the work of Christ except by faith alone. We deliberately need to turn away from ourselves and toward Christ, resting and relying on him alone in order to be declared righteous before God.

3. We cannot afford to die without this truth. Once we learn that we have already passed from death to life, that for us looking to Christ alone by faith alone the judicial verdict of God has been passed and we are declared righteous in his sight, we may then approach death without fear of future condemnation. Iain Murray tells an encouraging story that illustrates this:

About a hundred years ago Alexander Whyte, as a pastor in Edinburgh, visited one of his elders who was dying. A book was close to the man's hand and, recognizing that it was not the Bible, Whyte looked on the open page to see what it might be. There his eyes fell on the words, "Chapter 11--Of Justification":
Those whom God effectually calleth, he also freely justifieth: not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for any thing wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone; not by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God.
Murray adds "We too will die, and when that day comes there will be no truth we shall value more than the doctrine thus stated in the Westminster Confession of Faith."

The first book that I would encourage you to read is John V. Fesko's recently published Justification: Understanding the Classic Reformed Doctrine (available here). It is a substantial volume weighing in at 480 pages. This work seeks to set justification clearly in the framework of the history of salvation and the order of salvation. It also has an eye to recent controversies over justification by faith alone and seeks to understand and respond to challenges to the classic Reformed doctrine.

The second book takes us back to the 19th Century, where again the doctrine was under attack. Let me encourage you to read James Buchanan's classic work on The Doctrine of Justification (available here if you live in the US or here if you live in the UK). Buchanan deals with the OT and NT teaching on justification, justification in church history and various aspects of the doctrine.

Joel Beeke says:
Buchanan expounds the doctrine itself by covering the scriptural meaning of the term, its relation to the law and justice of God, its relation to the mediatorial work of Christ, its relation to grace and works, and more. The chapter on justification in relation to the work of the Holy Spirit is alone worth the price of the book.
Again it is a substantial volume at 540 pages.

The final book was written by the greatest theologian the British Isles has ever produced, John Owen. Owen's work The Doctrine of Justification by Faith (through the imputation of the righteousness of Christ explained, confirmed, and vindicated) is available here (US) or here (UK). At 448 pages it is the shortest of the three! You will find that Owen's work, although written in the seventeenth century, has a contemporary feel to it. It is proof positive that the same debates are played out again and again in church history. This work will enrich your soul as well as inform your mind.

Reading, like running, requires commitment and development. If you want to run a marathon you have to train and build up your stamina over long distances. We should all aim to read so that we can move onto to more substantial literature.

Take time to work through these volumes carefully. Meditate on them, summarize their points and arguments, digest their teaching, speak to others about what the Lord has taught you. And on your knees thank him for having mercy upon you a sinner by not counting your sins against you, but instead counting, as if it were yours, the obedience of your Lord and Saviour, your representative and substitute, the only mediator Jesus Christ.

Twelve years ago I wrote my undergraduate dissertation on Hans Kung's teaching on justification in relation to official Roman Catholic and classic Protestant views on the doctrine. I well remember at times spending twelve or thirteen hours a day working on it. I still remember the joy of laying my head on the pillow in the certain knowledge that it wasn't my works but Christ and his perfect work that was my righteousness before God. I thank God the same is true today and I can sing in the words of the old hymn:
A debtor to mercy alone, of covenant mercy I sing;
Nor fear, with Thy righteousness on, my person and off’ring to bring.
The terrors of law and of God with me can have nothing to do;
My Savior’s obedience and blood hide all my transgressions from view
Happy Reformation day!